Robust Judicial System – Quintessential for Democracy’s Survival: VP Dhankhar

Introduction: A Shield Against Erosion

Democracy, at its heart, is about the rule of law. It’s a system where power is balanced, and justice is accessible to all. But a healthy democracy isn’t just about laws; it’s about the ability of those laws – and the institutions that uphold them – to function effectively. Recently, Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar has powerfully underscored this crucial point: “A robust Judicial system is quintessential for the survival and blossoming of democracy.” This statement carries significant weight, reflecting a deep understanding of the judiciary’s vital role. In an era where freedom of expression and information are increasingly challenged, safeguarding the integrity of the judicial system – the bedrock of our democratic principles – becomes ever more critical. Let’s delve into why this sentiment resonates so profoundly.

The Importance of the Judiciary: A Historical Perspective

The concept of a robust judicial system isn’t new; it’s deeply rooted in the history of democratic governance. The idea of an independent judiciary – one capable of impartial judgment – has been a cornerstone of many democratic nations, including India. And the foundation for this idea lies in the concept established by the K.Veeraswami case in 1991. This landmark judgment, which clarified the fundamental principles of judicial independence, was a pivotal moment. It essentially cemented the idea that the Supreme Court held the ultimate authority over the interpretation of laws – a concept crucial for a functioning democracy.

VP Dhankhar’s Perspective: Safeguarding the Guardians of Justice

Vice President Dhankhar’s remarks highlight a critical challenge: protecting the judiciary from undue influence and ensuring its independence. He’s keenly aware of the potential risks. He’s rightly emphasized the need to “protect the judiciary, and we have to ensure the judges of the country are not made vulnerable because they decide fearlessly.” This sentiment underscores a serious concern – the judiciary’s potential to be scrutinized or, even worse, compromised. The fear of judicial overreach, a danger to democratic principles, is a very real one.

The Legacy of the Verma Case – A Landmark Judgement

Mr. Hansaria’s book, “The Constitution We Adopted (With Artworks),” introduces a fascinating narrative. The book focuses on revisiting the core of the constitution – the K.Veeraswami case, highlighting how this judgment preserved the crucial principle of judicial independence. It’s a reminder that the judicial process isn’t just about applying laws; it’s about upholding the fundamental rights and liberties enshrined within them.

Focus on Protocol and the Judiciary’s Role

The remarks of Chief Justice Gavai regarding protocol are also important. The judiciary, as a vital part of the government, has a specific set of rules and procedures it must follow. VP Dhankhar’s commitment to adhering to these protocols – maintaining decorum and professionalism – reinforces the judiciary’s position as a trustworthy and responsible institution. Maintaining this standard of conduct is essential for maintaining public confidence in the judicial system.

The Book – A Call to Action

The release of “The Constitution We Adopted” itself represents a vital effort to remind us of the foundational principles. It’s a collection of thoughtfully crafted essays, artwork, and discussions on the critical elements of our constitution. It’s a testament to the enduring importance of this legal system.

Conclusion: Strengthening Democracy Through Justice

VP Dhankhar’s words serve as a powerful reminder of the vital importance of a robust and independent Judiciary. It is a system that cannot be taken for granted. Ensuring its strength, impartiality, and integrity is not merely a matter of legal practicality; it is the bedrock of a thriving democracy. By safeguarding the judiciary, we safeguard the very foundations of our liberty, justice, and the rule of law.