Foreign Secretary Accuses Pakistan of Repeated Cream Skimming; Calls for Global Response from India

In 2019, Pakistan became its worst country to deal with in international relations after an intricate web of trade wars and a decades-long feud over a marginal piece of land. But now, the Senior Minister under Foreign Secretary Qasim Ajaz has taken matters into his own hands, accusing Pakistan of repeated actions known as ” Cream Skimming,” where the country has kept offering $10 billion dollars worth of raw materials to India at lower prices than it was ever going to charge. The accusation comes on the heels of a report by a senior member of the UN Security Council that warned against further trade tensions, which had been causing global chaos and instability.

The Senior Minister’s accusations are not just about Pakistan; they’ve drawn immediate condemnation from the world at large. In a statement released in late 2019, Ajaz made clear his firm stance: “We are not going to let this continue any longer. We are calling on all parties to respect the international norms of international relations and the principles of fairness, justice, and mutual benefit.” His remarks have already caused a stir, as Pakistan’s government has pushed back, claiming that it had agreed to a price that was lower than the $10 billion figure reported in Ajaz’s statement. But this doesn’t mean the situation is over; rather, it signals a shift in power dynamics within the region.

The Truth About Pakistan’s Actions

Pakistan, a country of vast forests and deserts, has been one of the world’s messiest nations for decades, often resorting to cheap labor and underpriced goods. In 2019, it appeared that Pakistan was ready to supply $10 billion worth of raw materials to India at an unusually low price. But by late January, a series of trade negotiations had revealed that this was far from the truth. When Pakistan submitted its latest bid for raw materials on December 31, the United States and other countries found itself in the crosshairs of a global trade war. This has not only affected the prices of goods imported into Pakistan but also raised concerns about energy security.

By the end of February, Pakistan had revealed that it would not increase its price below $18 billion per tonne for raw materials, citing supply chain challenges and geopolitical tensions as reasons. But in early March, a series of unorthodox trade deals led to a situation where Pakistan’s government claimed to have agreed to a price of $10 billion per tonne. This came at the cost of significant damage to relations with India, which had been working hard to secure the right supply. As Ajaz stands, he is clearly not content with this situation; his accusations are a clear call for the world to act in his favor.

The Indian Response

The United States and other countries have long been the go-to option for Pakistan when it comes to raw materials. But by mid-2019, this approach had become increasingly impractical due to global trade dynamics, which made it difficult to get cheaper supplies from other countries. In 2019 alone, India relied on more than $75 billion in raw materials imported from China, the U.S., and other nations. By February, this figure was expected to rise, but even that would be far from the low prices Pakistan had reported earlier.

In late March, the Indian government took a bold step by proposing a trade deal with Pakistan aimed at increasing its supply of raw materials. The deal would require both countries to accept a price lower than $10 billion per tonne for a key sector of their economy that is central to India’s energy and infrastructure industries. The proposal was met with widespread skepticism, however. At first glance, it seemed like a desperate move to secure the right supply, but as time went on, the situation evolved into one where both countries were vying for control over a limited resource.

By early April, Pakistan had already stepped back from its trade agreement, declaring that it would not sell at $10 billion per tonne. Meanwhile, India has been working tirelessly to respond to this challenge. In May, the Indian government proposed further trade deals aimed at increasing its supply of raw materials. These deals were more aggressive than the previous ones and involved additional measures, including importing materials from China and other countries.

As Ajaz stands, he is not just talking about Pakistan; he is also sounding a warning to India. The situation has not been easy for either country, and the way forward must involve clear cooperation and mutual respect. Both nations are playing their part in building an international framework that can address these issues fairly and without fear of further escalation.

Conclusion

The Senior Minister’s accusation is a bold statement, but it reflects a growing recognition of the complexity of international relations in the region. By targeting Pakistan with harsh and precise language, Ajaz signals his commitment to working with India and other countries to find a solution that benefits both nations and global stability. This is not just about trade; it is about building a world where peace and prosperity are our common aspirations.

As the years go by, we can see that the international community is working tirelessly to address these issues. By collaborating on trade agreements, negotiating for fair terms, and addressing the root causes of the problems at hand, the world is becoming more united in its efforts to achieve a sustainable future for everyone. The time has not yet come for Pakistan or India to surrender their positions; they are far from being done with this trade war and the underlying issues it represents.

In short, the facts speak clearly: the international community is not giving up on the issues at hand, but it will take a lot of hard work and relentless effort to get back on track. We can hope that the world sees this as an opportunity for growth rather than a blowout.